brord@telenet.be

publicaties in vakbladen en wetenschappelijke tijdschriften

  1. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Zorg om onafhankelijke, objectieve en integrale indicatiestelling [Concerns on independent, objective and integral assessment for care]. Medisch Contact, 1998; 53: 977-9.
  2. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Over medisch-objectieve deskundigheid bij de RIO’s. Een onafhankelijk arts als waarborg voor het algemeen belang [On medical-objective expertise for Regional Assessment Institutes. An independent medical advisor for the public interest]. Handicap & Beleid, 1999; 2: 13-5.
  3. Beemsterboer W.G.M. De ratio van de RIO’s. Meerwaarde van onafhankelijke, objectieve en integrale indicatiestelling [The ratio of the Regional Assessment Institutes. The surplus value of independent, objective and integral assessment]. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 2000; 4: 238-43.
  4. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Mandatering frustreert integrale indicatiestelling [Mandate frustrates integral assessment]. Ouderenzorg, 2000; 7: 13.
  5. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Mondigheid, bureaucratie en deskundigheid. Over dilemma’s bij indicatiestelling [Joint decision making, bureaucracy and capability. On dilemmas in assessment]. Tijdschrift voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, 2001; 3: 93-5.
  6. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Indicatiestelling en individualisering. Deel 1: de vermeende ‘oneindige’ zorgvraag [Assessment and customisation. Part 1: the supposed ‘endless’ request for care]. Modern Medicine, 2002; 1: 26-8.
  7. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Indicatiestelling en individualisering. Deel 2: vraag niet wat de zorg (al) voor u kan doen, maar wat u (nog) aan zelfzorg kunt doen. [Assessment and customisation. Part 2: do not ask what care can mean to you, but what (self)care you yourself can provide]. Modern Medicine, 2002; 2: 92-4.
  8. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Indicatiestelling en individualisering. Deel 3: geneeskunde, natuur- of menswetenschap: ‘science’ of ‘fiction’? [Assessment and customisation. Part 3: medicine, science or sociology: science or fiction?]. Modern Medicine, 2002; 3: 147-9.
  9. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Indicatiestelling en individualisering. Deel 6 (slot): wat is vraaggerichte zorg en hoe verhoudt zich dit tot de WHO-definitie van gezondheid? [Assessment and customisation. Part 6 (conclusion): what is request directed care and how is it related to the WHO-definition of health?]. Modern Medicine, 2002; 6: 341-2.
  10. Beemsterboer W.G.M. ‘Zonder richtlijnen voor RIO’s gaat de zorg dezelfde kant op als de WAO.’ [‘Without directives for the Regional Assessment Institutes care is going in the same direction as the Disability Law’]. Interview in: Handicap en Beleid, 2003; 10: 4-7.
  1. Beemsterboer W.G.M. WAO-keuring niet aan één persoon overlaten [Do not leave examination for disability to one person]. Trouw, 10 oktober 2003.
  2. Beemsterboer W.G.M. Leve de gemoderniseerde AWBZ! [Long live the modernised Law for Specific Health Costs]. ‘G’, vakblad over gezondheid en maatschappij, 2004.
  3. Beemsterboer W, Stewart R, Groothoff J, Nijhuis F. On regional differences in duration of sick leave: the role of work, individual and health characteristics. Archives of Public Health, 2005; 63: 293-312.
  4. Beemsterboer W, Stewart R, Groothoff J, Nijhuis F. A literature review on sick leave frequency eterminants of the past decades. Archives of Public Health, 2008; 66: 26-34.
  5. Beemsterboer Willibrord, Roy Stewart, Johan Groothoff, Frans Nijhuis. The influence of sick leave frequency determinants on Homogeneous groups in two socio-economically comparable, but socio-culturally different regions in the Netherlands. Central European Journal of Public Health, 008;16(4):151-160.
  6. Beemsterboer W.G.M., Stewart R.E., Groothoff J.W., F.J.N.Nijhuis. On regional differences in ick leave: the role of work, individual and health characteristics and socio-cultural environment. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 2008;21(4): 345-361.
  7. Beemsterboer W.G.M., Groothoff J.W., F.J.N.Nijhuis. A literature review on sick leave determinants (1984-2004). International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 2009; 22(2): 169 –179.
  8. Beemsterboer W.G.M., Stewart R.E., Groothoff .W.,F.J.N.Nijhuis. On regional differences in determinants of sick leave frequency for workers in cleaning in two regions in the Netherlands; a comparative study. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2009; 22(3): 203-14.
  9. Beemsterboer Willibrord, Roy Stewart, Johan Groothoff, Frans Nijhuis. Determinants of regional differences in sick leave duration for homogeneous groups in the Netherlands: their implications for social security policy-making. Central European Journal of Public Health (1/2010). (16th November 2009 accepted for publication.)
  10. Beemsterboer W.G.M. On regional differences in sick leave: the role of work, individual and health characteristics and of socio-cultural environment. Thesis Universiteit Maastricht, Datawyse Maastricht 2009.
Back To Top